Thank you and I really appreciate your constructive comment.

I see your point, which is something I've thought about too. But I figured I'd detail the numbers and info anyway, however misleading and blunt they may be, rather than giving the impression of trying to hide something. And then explain what they really mean later on.

Sure, the anti-vaccine groups would probably use it to their advantage. Some of my older articles have been used that way. But I believe the anti-vaccine groups already have plenty of anti-vaccine resources. So, I doubt mine would make a difference. I can only hope the readers would read on to see what the article really means.

Yeah, I agree the headline is misleading. I've edited it, and I hope it's a bit better.